What do Agatha Christie’s Greta Ohlsson and Nancy Pelosi have in common?
Read my post, Nancy {hearts} Antonio, and find out!
American and Latin American Politics, Society, and Culture
By Fausta
What do Agatha Christie’s Greta Ohlsson and Nancy Pelosi have in common?
Read my post, Nancy {hearts} Antonio, and find out!
By Fausta
Soundbites all over the place:
Former President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner returned to the City of Buenos Aires yesterday to celebrate the birth of her former friend and ally, late Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez. In an event held in the Instituto Patria (IP), the recently inaugurated Kirchnerite think tank, Cristina remembered Chávez, who died in 2013 and would have turned 62 yesterday, but also spoke about why, in her opinion, her Victory Front (FpV) party lost against President Mauricio Macri’s Cambiemos in the last elections. She hinted at Argentines being swayed by media conglomerates and other interested groups that don’t have the people’s best interest in mind.
Over in Philly, Nancy Pelosi was deploring white men who “voted against their own economic interests”
Because we all need to be condescended to.
By Fausta
Nancy and Joe on abortion? Anything but Catholic.
Read my article here.
Related:
Hillary Clinton: No Limits on Abortion, Not Even In the Ninth Month of Pregnancy
Carly Fiorina is especially being battered by these “misleading’ claims horseshit, because she gave such a riveting accounting of the videos, daring people to watch them.
Well, the media is very insistent that you not do that. That’s why they tend not to run the tapes when they claim they’re misleading — the public would see the media’s claims are bullshit.
Well, Fiorina’s PAC is running them in their response to these bullshit claims.
CONTENT WARNING — contains the upsetting footage the media doesn’t want you to see.
By Fausta
Ah, for the optics!
My friend Silvio Canto, Jr. was keeping track of how many times the Hotel Saratoga, where Nancy Pelosi stayed during her Havana junket, had been expropriated by the Communist regime. He found out it was expropriated twice: once in 1959, and again in 2011:
in 2011, Castro confiscated Coral Capital’s minority stake in The Hotel Saratoga.
And for giggles, he had Coral Capital’s two senior executives in Cuba, Amado Fahkre and Stephen Purvis, imprisoned in the notorious torture facility known as Villa Marista (akin to Moscow’s infamous Lubyanka).
Fahkre and Purvis spent nearly two years arbitrarily imprisoned, had all their assets confiscated and were finally expelled to Britain.
Purvis, as you may recall, does not hold fond memories of the sixteen months he was jailed, and Coral was contemplating suing the Cuban regime for the $20+million it seized.
Indeed, the Saratoga ought to be an object lesson to all who contemplate investing with the Cuban regime; a lesson lost on Nancy.
By Fausta
Two, not one, rulings regarding the 2001 defaulted bonds, upholding U.S. contract law; As I had mentioned earlier,
This is an interesting case, not just because Argentina initially had to issue the bonds with a guarantee that they would pay them in full because the country had already defaulted, but also because it may set a precedent for any future sovereign debt or municipal debt restructurings.
In one highly anticipated case, the justices rejected Argentina’s request that the high court intervene in litigation with holdout hedge funds that had refused to accept the country’s debt-restructuring offers.
The Supreme Court, without comment, left in place a lower-court ruling that said Argentina can’t make payments on its restructured debt unless it also pays the holdouts.
And then there’s the disclosure case,
In a second related case, the high court ruled that bank records about Argentina’s international assets can be made available to one holdout creditor seeking to collect on court judgments stemming from the default.
To add to the double whammy, the decision was 7 to 1; Lyle Denniston of SCOTUS blog explains,
Besides refusing to hear Argentina’s plea that U.S. courts had no authority to command how it, as a sovereign nation, deals with holders of its external debt, the Court silently turned aside a plea by Argentina to get an interpretation by New York state courts of just what legal obligations of equal treatment Argentina has undertaken in selling the now-defaulted bonds.
In contrast to the simple denial of those issues, the Court issued a full-dress opinion on the separate question of how wide an opportunity the holders of defaulted bonds would have to gather information from two banks about the location of Argentina’s financial assets overseas.
In an opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia, the Court rejected Argentina’s argument that those bondholders could only seek information about assets that that country keeps in the United States. Argentina had relied upon a 1976 U.S. law seeking to insulate foreign governments from some legal obligations in U.S. courts.
For one thing, Justice Scalia noted, Argentina had given up its immunity to demands for information about its assets that could be used to cover its obligations on debts. But, in addition, Scalia wrote, the 1976 law on foreign immunity simply says nothing at all about giving foreign governments immunity to demands that they produce information that may be necessary to satisfy a debt obligation they had undertaken.
This means the investors can get access to a wide number of bank records to locate financial assets overseas that they might be able to seize as compensation.
Argentina had sent a delegation to meet with Nancy Pelosi last week to discuss the debt,
Hours earlier, the Argentine delegation had lunch with former US solicitor-general Paul Clement — a legal adviser for the Argentine position against the hedge funds that have refused to restructure the country’s defaulted debt — and representatives from the Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton law firm.
Justice Sotomayor had recused herself.
You can read the decision in full here.
Argentina’s bond drama: pathway to peace or a new Falklands?
Argentina Loses US Supreme Court Appeal In Key Hedge Fund Case, Now In Its 12th Year
Cristina Fernández will address the nation on television at 9 pm local time tonight.
By Fausta
Inmates in charge of the asylum (h/t Betsy),
In the video Pelosi says, “He’s (Bush) saying something to the effect of we’re so glad to welcome you here, congratulations and I know you’ll probably have some different things to say about what is going on–which is correct. But, as he was saying this, he was fading and this other thing was happening to me.”
“My chair was getting crowded in,” said Pelosi. “I swear this happened, never happened before, it never happened since.”
“My chair was getting crowded in and I couldn’t figure out what it was, it was like this,” she said.
“And then I realized Susan B. Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Lucretia Mott, Alice Paul, Sojourner Truth, you name it, they were all in that chair, they were,” said Pelosi. “More than I named and I could hear them say: ‘At last we have a seat at the table.’ And then they were gone.”
They probably went to hang out with Eleanor Roosevelt.
Video below the fold, since it starts right away,
[Read more…]
By Fausta
A sign of desperation?
Nancy’s so optimistic she doesn’t want Democrats to attend the convention; instead, she wants them out on the field:
“I’m not encouraging anyone to go to the convention, having nothing to do with anything except I think they should stay home, campaign in their districts, use their financial and political resources to help them win their election,” Pelosi said in an exclusive interview for POLITICO Live’s On Congress, a new weekly show to be streamed live on POLITICO’s website and broadcast on NewsChannel 8 on Wednesdays.
After all,
“We nominated a president last time. We have an incumbent President of the United States. We’re very proud of him. There certainly will be enough people there to express that pride, but I’m not encouraging members to go to the convention no matter what the situation was, because they can be home. It’s campaign time. It’s the first week in September,” she said.
In addition, Pelosi also wouldn’t commit to serving in the leadership of the 113th Congress.
“I wouldn’t assume anything,” she told POLITICO editor in chief John Harris and reporter Lois Romano. “I would just assume that Democrats would win and we would stop the obstruction of the President’s agenda. I think it’s fair to say that most people don’t have the faintest idea about leadership races in the Congress.”
Does that mean she’s worried that the Senate will be in play? Are the internals that bad?
Will she help out Wiener Weiner on his comeback?
Or is she going to focus her attention on her outsourced investments?
And,
will she go to the Convention, or is she going to “stay home, campaign in her district, use her financial and political resources to help them win their election” instead?
By Fausta
After Patterico (here, here and here) broke the story of Anthony Weiner’s talking dirty to underage girls and the mainstream news media picked up the story, Nancy Pelosi wants him to quit.
He’s going on leave and will check himself into a treatment center instead, for treatment of The Weiner Syndrome,
You would think that Nancy would know better than to expect that a guy who had Bill Clinton officiate at his wedding would quit.