Bill on going negative: media bias made her do it
Bill Clinton voiced his abiding anger at the media’s coverage of him and his wife in Durham, N.H., today, and suggested that media bias will force Clinton to go negative on Barack Obama.
He also expressed his frustration that his wife is perceived by voters as divisive through, he said, no fault of her own.
because she is the most innocent. Plweeez!
Now Bill wants us to believe that it’s all the fault of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy – and the media’s part of it??
Just don’t ask her questions, right?
Via Yid With Lid, Dick Morris sees BilHil as the couple that can’t stop thinking about yesterday.
With the Clinton’s, it’s always someone else’s fault.
Let me ask my readers, why does the American public keep Bill and Hillary in the political scene? Why aren’t these two ostracized for their lies?
UPDATE
Hillary and the Psychic
Via Instapundit, Siggy and Raven, blogger Andrew Olmstead died in Iraq. Here’s his last post.
My heartfelt condolences to his loved ones.
Via Larwyn, it’s clear that NJ politicians have their priorities, while American Tort Reform Association Names Atlantic County, New Jersey a “Judicial Hellhole” for 2007.
Cinnamon Stillwell posts CAIR’s Rebuttal to her column on Savage vs. CAIR: The battle over free speech.
Sudanese Thinker writes about the US Diplomat Shot Dead In Khartoum
You must read the whole post.
Yesterday Siggy and I discussed Iowa in a 15-minute podcast. We had a great time and great feedback from our listeners. Siggy took the Dr. House approach to politics and referred to Obama and Romney as “the cabbage patch candidates”, while I asked, “Who in the world is going to vote for Huckabee for president?”
You can subscribe to my podcast via iTunes here.
Americans want to be entertained, and the Clintons are one of the longest running soap operas available. People have very little sense of civic responsibility any more, but they enjoy seeing their favorite entertainers, and the Clintons qualify on that account.
You do have a point, Dr.D. It’s certainly a great group of characters, but of bad character, that is.
Olmsted. Not “Olmstead.”
Oops – I should learn to check my spelling, shouldn’t I?