Fausta's Blog

American and Latin American Politics, Society, and Culture

November 2, 2007 By Fausta

All about Martha

In Wednesday’s podcast, Mamacita asked,

I wonder how many of our Halloween customs and our fear of the unknown are based on the fact that Americans fear death far more than any other culture does. We don’t touch the dead, we don’t associate with the dead the way other cultures do… Other cultures wash their dead, they dress their dead, they put the dead in their living room.

Siggy posted

we touched on death and how little real connection we have to that life cycle event. Parents and grandparents are shipped out to nursing homes. We regard death as a medical event only, and not as a family event. Taking care of the remains of loved ones has become no different than sending out clothes to a dry cleaners.

I agree up to a point. I don’t have any reason to believe that ours is the culture that most fears death. Additionally, my experience is that in poor countries anyone who can afford a servant has one, and that servant is the one taking care of the daily chores. In India, an entire caste took care of the dead.

But the point in which we all agree – Mamacita, Teo, Siggy and I – is that in our contemporary society we are increasingly isolating ourselves from human contact and from dealing with the day-to-day activities that keep us in touch with what real death and real life are all about. As Siggy said,

All the things that are part of our existence, at least in Western culture, we can farm out.

This is not new; indeed it goes back to Egyptian times when they were farming out the chores to the Israelites (who left as soon as they were able to).

First let’s look at the daily chores; tomorrow I’ll discuss the ageing aspect.

In the New Testament we have Martha, whose name means lady; mistress of the house. Saint Martha according to the Dictionary of Saints,

(1st century). The sister of Lazarus and of Mary who is often identified with Mary Magdalene, Martha received Christ in their household at Bethany, which was specially loved by him (Luke 10: 38–42), on which occasion he gently reproved her for her complaint that her sister Mary did not help her sufficiently in the necessary preparations. The words of Christ were frequently represented as indicating the excellence of the contemplative life (represented by Mary) over the cares of the active life, represented by Martha. In the Gospel of John, Martha also appeared on the occasion of the Raising of Lazarus ( John 11: 1–46), when her faith in Christ and his divine power was the occasion for the famous words ‘I am the resurrection and the life’, and for the miracle of Lazarus’ return to life. It was also recorded that Christ once again had supper at Bethany, where Martha served him six days before the passover ( John 12: 1–2). This is all that can be known of her from the New Testament; there is no early tradition about her death.

Martha, then, is connected to the care of the home (Luke 10: 38–42)

38As Jesus and his disciples were on their way, he came to a village where a woman named Martha opened her home to him.
39She had a sister called Mary, who sat at the Lord’s feet listening to what he said.
40But Martha was distracted by all the preparations that had to be made. She came to him and asked, “Lord, don’t you care that my sister has left me to do the work by myself? Tell her to help me!”
41″Martha, Martha,” the Lord answered, “you are worried and upset about many things, 42but only one thing is needed.[a] Mary has chosen what is better, and it will not be taken away from her.”

This passage is now interpreted to mean that spiritual matters take precedence over material matters. However, having done some entertaining of my own, I still find it irksome. As Dymphna said,

I think Jesus would’ve had a different answer if they both sat around listening to Him and there was no supper.

Or if Jesus and the Apostles arrived at Martha’s house and there was no place to sit because of the dirt and all the clutter.

Obviously I’m not quite up to speed when it comes to the contemplative life. But I digress.

Martha is also involved in the care of the dead, first with the resurrection of her brother Lazarus (John 11: 1–46), who is resurrected through her faith,

17On his arrival, Jesus found that Lazarus had already been in the tomb for four days. 18Bethany was less than two miles[a] from Jerusalem, 19and many Jews had come to Martha and Mary to comfort them in the loss of their brother. 20When Martha heard that Jesus was coming, she went out to meet him, but Mary stayed at home.
21″Lord,” Martha said to Jesus, “if you had been here, my brother would not have died.
22But I know that even now God will give you whatever you ask.”
23Jesus said to her, “Your brother will rise again.”
24Martha answered, “I know he will rise again in the resurrection at the last day.”
25Jesus said to her, “I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in me will live, even though he dies;
26and whoever lives and believes in me will never die. Do you believe this?”
27″Yes, Lord,” she told him, “I believe that you are the Christ,[b] the Son of God, who was to come into the world.”

And also with Jesus’s own death, since he spent the six days before Passover at her house.

Martha then, to me symbolizes the balance of the spiritual – which is sometimes lacking in our day – with the cotidian.

Unfortunately, in our modern world we now seem to have lost both.

As readers of this blog know, I’m addicted to HGTV and other do-it-yourself programs. In several programs, TV crews go to people’s houses and reorganize years’ and decades’ worth of decay and neglect.

The only question I have when I have watched these programs is,How can one’s spirit be so lost that one can live in such chaos?

In her excellent book, Home Comforts: The Art and Science of Keeping House, Cheryl Mendelson says,

When you keep house, you use your head, your heart and your hands together to create a home – the place where you live the most important parts of your private life.

And that’s what it all comes down to, isn’t it: creating a home with our heads, our hearts and our hands.

At least one woman – not coincidentally named Martha – has also created a huge enterprise out of homemaking, too, which is almost a conondrum of feminism. Siggy’s commenter Expat brought up feminism,

With respect to our current distance from death, I think that this affects feminist ideology. Many younger women don’t seem to realize that much of the work previously done by many women–feeding the family, raising the children, caring for the sick, and consolling the dying – was actually much more relevant to meaning of life questions than today’s “careers.” I become really angry when modern feminists act as though women like my mother and her sisters were some sort of mindless victims. Even without a college education, these women knew more about life than today’s fem will ever learn at the University of Delaware.

Mamacita also pointed out that in our society we’re encouraged not to touch each other at all (except possibly in a sexual context). As Teo mentioned in the podcast, we’re behaving as adolescents, outsourcing hardship, focused on sex instead of on meaningful human contact, and isolating ourselves by technology.

Teo pointed out that

In some fashion, Halloween, when all these kids run around collecting candy, with their parents, dressed up as all kinds of things, is a throwback to a world that was invented, in many respects, but that seeks to recreate a world as it was.

Maybe it’s time we touched each other more, and we paid more attention to creating homes with our heads, our hearts and our hands.

Do we risk getting hurt by doing so?

And if we do, is it worth it?

Tomorrow I’ll post about the subject of age, as we mentioned in the podcast.

CONTINUED on Saturday November 3:

(On the subject of Martha, see also this interesting essay by Clara Beth Speel Van de Water )

Digg!

Share on Facebook

Share

Filed Under: podcasts, relationships, religion, Scheiss Weekly, Sigmund Carl and Alfred, Teo Ruiz

Comments

  1. Patm says

    November 2, 2007 at 12:49 pm

    I’ve thought a lot about this. Very good post.

  2. GM Roper says

    November 2, 2007 at 1:04 pm

    Dear Fausta,

    Damn woman, when you decide to post a Pulitzer worthy blog post, you do it up proper.

    Being a lung cancer survivor (so far 22months) I focused in on the part of the discussion concerning death. I had been sheltered from death until I was 15 when my paternal grandmother died. Going to her funeral which was “open casket” all I could remember of her for years afterward was her lying in the coffin. When my granddad died 5 months later, we were so far away, only dad could afford to go to the funeral and I had no trouble remembering my irascible granddad as a walking talking human being.

    Being a lung cancer survivor (so far 22months) I focused in on the part of the discussion concerning death. I had been sheltered from death until I was 15 when my paternal grandmother died. Going to her funeral which was “open casket” all I could remember of her for years afterward was her lying in the coffin. When my granddad died 5 months later, we were so far away, only dad could afford to go to the funeral and I had no trouble remembering my irrascible granddad as a walking talking human being.

    I’ve thought and thought about death and dying over the last 22 months, decided I was ready if it came, and also decided that there was no way in hell I was going to go without a hellacious fight. Dr. Death will have to fight like the dickens to get me.

    I remember my other grandfather, who was a minister, reminisce about growing up close with death and dying and how it was a natural and necessary part of life. The differences seem to me to be huge. We ignore death and so we become afraid of it, we do not cherish our homemakers who deal with all of the necessary steps to making a house a home a hearth more than a place to cook food and all the little enjoyable (and sometimes not so enjoyable) things that go into a life between the first wail after birth to the last gasp at death.

    When we become comfortable with who we are, then and only then can we begin to be comfortable with where we are going.

    Excellent thought provoking post. Long may your banner wave!

  3. Mamacita (Mamacita) says

    November 2, 2007 at 2:37 pm

    Oh Fausta, you wrap it all up so beautifully! Sometimes, even my writing seems to stutter and I can’t say it as I am thinking it. YOU can take my thoughts and your thoughts and Siggy’s thoughts and make miracles with them.

    Also, I have always sympathized with Martha. The Biblical one, not the K-Mart one.

    My dear friend Brenda Poinsett has written a lovely book about this very concept. http://www.amazon.com/Can-Martha-Have-Mary-Christmas/dp/0739460129/ref=sr_1_13/002-8844383-6817614?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1194028566&sr=1-13

  4. Francis W. Porretto says

    November 2, 2007 at 3:12 pm

    This is beautiful, dear. It stimulates many thoughts.

    First, for the proper tone, something I read in one of Raymond Smullyan’s books, long ago: “Why worry about death? It’s not going to happen in my lifetime!”

    Second, and rather more important, No living creature embedded in the matrix of Time could fail to do either, yet still survive in a competitive ecology. But for all of that, it is equally part of our natures, bred into us over half a million years as sentient beings, to be repelled by death, its manifestations and excrescences, and persons who treat with death occupationally. Cultures that become fascinated by death, or obsessed with it…die.

    All the same, dealing with death in a civilized and dignified manner is obligatory. Many of our legal and social institutions have no other purpose but to wrap death in appropriately stately, appropriately somber garb. We don’t leave corpses on the street. Funeral homes strain to balance the commemoration of life and legacy with the acceptance of loss. Cemeteries and mausoleums are places where strict rules of decorum apply. Municipalities maintain “potter’s fields” where the indigent are interred at public expense. And of course, we don’t speak ill of the dead…well, most of us don’t; the rest hang out at Daily Kos.

    An advanced civilization will respond to an unpleasant but predictable necessity by creating such dedicated institutions. The tough part is paying the resulting institutions the appropriate degree of respect. After all, we didn’t create them because we actively wanted to, but because all the alternatives were worse. So our young must endure developmental conditioning that will predispose them toward respectful behavior under dispreferred circumstances: funerals, visits to nursing homes, hospitals, and the homes of failing relatives; coping with smelly Grandpa. The conditioning doesn’t always take, but we do the best we can.

    There are other trends afoot, of course. Medicine continues to increase our lifespans, and certain elements of medical research suggest that even aging itself is curable. No one could fail to be attracted by the possibility of a prolonged life in a state of youthful vigor and attractiveness. But no matter how good our biologists and physicians get at prolonging our lives and vital forces, we will still die, from accident, disease, violence, or suicide. One of the unpleasant trends in contemporary thought is the promotion of the contrary view: that sooner or later, mortality itself will be “cured.”

    I don’t believe it to be possible, but let’s postulate it for the nonce. If Mankind were to lose its cognizance of and respect for death, what would happen to our attitudes toward life? Would it not be immeasurably cheapened? Would we not slide inexorably into complete ennui? No life, infinitely prolonged, could possibly be significant. Any dividend of achievement, love, or experience would sit atop an infinite divisor. Quotient: zero!

    Or imagine rather that immortality were available only at a high monetary price. That would be all but certain; it would be the greatest medical advancement of all time, and no doubt would be available at first only to the most fortunate few. What then? Would we not have created a new have-not class? Wouldn’t that class raise a cry unprecedented in the history of Man? Let slide the question of whether there’s necessarily any unfairness involved in having to pay for such a treatment; the ululations would still drown out all other speech or thought. The resulting convulsions could well destroy society.

    We prefer to keep those who tend to the dead on the margins of society. At the very least, But not only are they of us; they are essential to us, and to what it means to be men.

  5. Francis W. Porretto says

    November 2, 2007 at 3:14 pm

    Whoops, something went wrong when that comment posted. Blogger must have dropped a tag. It previewed correctly; sorry!

Tweets by @Fausta
retirees_raise-2015_300x250

Pages

  • About
  • Email

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Previous Posts

  • Mrs. Maisel goes full Alinsky on Mrs. Schlafly
  • Venezuela: Did the Minister of Defense back out at the last minute?
  • You need to unfriend me
  • Go ahead and Kiss the Girl, if you dare
  • Ashamed

Recent Comments

  • John on Mrs. Maisel goes full Alinsky on Mrs. Schlafly
  • Today’s hot topics: Democrats’ collusion shift, tax-return rift, Venezuela drift, and more! – PoliticalWitchDoctor.com on Venezuela: Did the Minister of Defense back out at the last minute?
  • Today’s hot topics: Democrats’ collusion shift, tax-return rift, Venezuela drift, and more! - AmericanTruthToday on Venezuela: Did the Minister of Defense back out at the last minute?
  • Did Venezuela’s Minister of Defense Back Out At The Last Minute? on Venezuela: Did the Minister of Defense back out at the last minute?
  • Roseanne Not Back, Khan not Invited, Operaman’s back, Jobs back, Fausta’s back (but not here yet) Thoughts under the fedora – Da Tech Guy Blog on Venezuela: Did the Minister of Defense back out at the last minute?

Archives

  • 2019
    • December 2019
    • May 2019
    • January 2019
  • 2018
    • December 2018
    • October 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
  • 2017
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
  • 2016
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
  • 2015
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
  • 2014
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
  • 2013
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
  • 2012
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
  • 2011
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
  • 2010
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
  • 2009
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
  • 2008
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
  • 2007
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • February 2007
    • January 2007
  • 2006
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
    • July 2006
    • June 2006
    • May 2006
    • April 2006
    • March 2006
    • February 2006
    • January 2006
  • 2005
    • December 2005
    • November 2005
    • October 2005
    • September 2005
    • August 2005
    • July 2005
    • June 2005
    • May 2005
    • April 2005
    • March 2005
    • February 2005
    • January 2005
  • 2004
    • December 2004
    • November 2004
    • October 2004
    • September 2004
    • August 2004
    • July 2004
    • June 2004
    • May 2004
    • April 2004
    • March 2004
Content Copyright Fausta's Blog

Site Developed and Managed by 300m.com