<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When did ethnicity become race?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://faustasblog.com/2013/02/when-did-ethnicity-become-race/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://faustasblog.com/2013/02/when-did-ethnicity-become-race/</link>
	<description>Faustam fortuna adiuvat</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:38:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fausta</title>
		<link>http://faustasblog.com/2013/02/when-did-ethnicity-become-race/comment-page-1/#comment-145502</link>
		<dc:creator>Fausta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 14:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faustasblog.com/?p=34331#comment-145502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And how much &quot;nuance&quot; did ted Kennedy have, fuster?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And how much &#8220;nuance&#8221; did ted Kennedy have, fuster?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fuster</title>
		<link>http://faustasblog.com/2013/02/when-did-ethnicity-become-race/comment-page-1/#comment-145386</link>
		<dc:creator>fuster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 22:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faustasblog.com/?p=34331#comment-145386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Could be that ted Cruz is under attack because he&#039;s not too ethical or honest in his speech and deserves to be attacked because he makes claims that are not too sane.



--------

    &quot; He then went on to assert that Obama, who attended Harvard Law School four years ahead of him, “would have made a perfect president of Harvard Law School.” The reason, said Cruz, was that, “There were fewer declared Republicans in the faculty when we were there than Communists! There was one Republican. But there were twelve who would say they were Marxists who believed in the Communists overthrowing the United States government.”

...

   Harvard Law School Professor Charles Fried, a Republican who served as Ronald Reagan’s Solicitor General from 1985 to 1989, and who subsequently taught Cruz at the law school, suggests that his former student has his facts wrong. “I can right offhand count four “out” Republicans (including myself) and I don’t know how many closeted Republicans when Ted, who was my student and the editor on the Harvard Law Review who helped me with my Supreme Court foreword, was a student here.”
Fried went on to say that unlike Cruz, or McCarthy, who infamously kept tallies of alleged subversives, he had never tried to count Communists. “I have not taken a poll, but I would be surprised if there were any members of the faculty who ‘believed in the Communists overthrowing the U.S. government,’” he said.


http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/comment/2013/02/ted-cruz-sees-red-not-crimson-at-harvard.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could be that ted Cruz is under attack because he&#8217;s not too ethical or honest in his speech and deserves to be attacked because he makes claims that are not too sane.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>    &#8221; He then went on to assert that Obama, who attended Harvard Law School four years ahead of him, “would have made a perfect president of Harvard Law School.” The reason, said Cruz, was that, “There were fewer declared Republicans in the faculty when we were there than Communists! There was one Republican. But there were twelve who would say they were Marxists who believed in the Communists overthrowing the United States government.”</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>   Harvard Law School Professor Charles Fried, a Republican who served as Ronald Reagan’s Solicitor General from 1985 to 1989, and who subsequently taught Cruz at the law school, suggests that his former student has his facts wrong. “I can right offhand count four “out” Republicans (including myself) and I don’t know how many closeted Republicans when Ted, who was my student and the editor on the Harvard Law Review who helped me with my Supreme Court foreword, was a student here.”<br />
Fried went on to say that unlike Cruz, or McCarthy, who infamously kept tallies of alleged subversives, he had never tried to count Communists. “I have not taken a poll, but I would be surprised if there were any members of the faculty who ‘believed in the Communists overthrowing the U.S. government,’” he said.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/comment/2013/02/ted-cruz-sees-red-not-crimson-at-harvard.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/comment/2013/02/ted-cruz-sees-red-not-crimson-at-harvard.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: When did ethnicity become race? - US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum</title>
		<link>http://faustasblog.com/2013/02/when-did-ethnicity-become-race/comment-page-1/#comment-145343</link>
		<dc:creator>When did ethnicity become race? - US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 18:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faustasblog.com/?p=34331#comment-145343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] ethnicity become race?      Quote: When liberals want you in the minority plantation:  by Fausta @ When did ethnicity become race? &#124; Fausta&#039;s Blog poses an interesting question. You can read all of it at the above [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ethnicity become race?      Quote: When liberals want you in the minority plantation:  by Fausta @ When did ethnicity become race? | Fausta&#039;s Blog poses an interesting question. You can read all of it at the above [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
