In Defense of Marco Rubio’s Story of His Family’s Exile

It is amazing that Democrats can not wrap around their minds the undeniable fact that many Cubans would have fled both Batista and Castro:
Carlos Eire writes In Defense of Marco Rubio’s Story of His Family’s Exile

The truth is this: Marco Rubio’s parents left Cuba during the Batista dictatorship, hoping to someday return to a free and prosperous Cuba. Unfortunately, Fidel Castro proved far worse than his predecessor, so, after a relatively brief and tentative attempt to resettle in post-Batista Cuba, his family realized that their dream could not be fulfilled. Faced with the grim realities of Castrolandia, which they tested out first-hand, they decided to remain in the United States, never ceasing to yearn for their homeland, ever frustrated over the enslavement of their nation.

Any Cubans returning from the United States in the early 1960s, like the Rubio family, could not help but notice that life in Cuba had become intolerable for anyone who was not a die-hard communist. I know so many Cubans who left the island during Batista’s dictatorship that I cannot even count their number; every one of them who returned to post-Batista Cuba—save one of my relatives who was a communist and loved Fidel—found it necessary to flee to the United States once again after getting a taste of the Castroite totalitarian state. I have one cousin who lived in the United States before 1959 and returned to Cuba only to find himself thrown in prison for nearly twenty years, simply for opposing the Castro regime. Worse than that, his father was imprisoned and tortured too, just because he had a renegade son.

The fears that drove Marco Rubio’s parents to flee Castro’s Cuba, then, were very real—indeed, they were exactly the same fears that drove out others who had never before left their homeland. This is a point that the Washington Post reporters who “exposed” Rubio’s deceit failed to appreciate. Stressing that Marco Rubio’s parents had spent very little time in post-Batista Cuba, they insinuated that they really never experienced oppression on the island. But no one returning to Cuba in 1961 needed more than a day or two to experience the full crushing weight of repression. 1961 was the year when private property was abolished, bank accounts were seized, and the Bay of Pigs invasion lead to waves of politically-motivated arrests (including of my cousin and uncle). It was also the year when spy houses were set up on every city block, children began to be subjected to heavy-handed indoctrination in schools, and Cuban parents started sending their children by the tens of thousands to the United States, just so they could live in freedom, not knowing if they would ever see them again. (I was one of those 14,000 kids, and so was my brother.) In sum, no one could fail to notice what a hellhole Cuba had become in 1961, and how utterly dark its future seemed.

Go read the whole thing.

Tags: ,

3 Responses to “In Defense of Marco Rubio’s Story of His Family’s Exile”

  1. jlh Says:

    Thank you for the lengthy excerpt from Eires’ article and the contact to it. Does the research editor of the WaPo, Alice Crites. who “contributed” to the story, or anyone else involved have anything like the credentials of Eires, or you, to say nothing of both?

    At one point, Eires says: “One of the hardest challenges faced by those of us who have lived under tyrants is the task of explaining dictatorships to Americans.”

    The WaPo makes cynical use of this naivete among those who have never known such tyranny to play mind games. If they and the other left-leaning press get what they want this November, we may all experience it first-hand.

  2. Fausta Says:

    And what’s even more baffling, JLH, is that the WaPo & others, don’t seem to acknowledge the fact that millions of American citizens like Eire and others have lived under dictatorships.

  3. Bigfoot Says:

    I remember learning about Iranians who hated both the Shah and the Ayatollahs.