Fannie, Freddie, and Barnie

The Price for Fannie and Freddie Keeps Going Up
Barney Frank’s decision to ‘roll the dice’ on subsidized housing is becoming an epic disaster for taxpayers.
Bad news now,

On Christmas Eve, when most Americans’ minds were on other things, the Treasury Department announced that it was removing the $400 billion cap from what the administration believes will be necessary to keep Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac solvent. This action confirms that the decade-long congressional failure to more closely regulate these two government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) will rank for U.S. taxpayers as one of the worst policy disasters in our history.

Bad news then,

Fannie and Freddie’s congressional sponsors—some of whom are now leading the administration’s effort to “reform” the financial system—have a lot to answer for. Rep. Barney Frank (D., Mass.), chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, sponsored legislation adopted in 2008 that established a new regulatory structure for the GSEs. But by then it was far too late. The GSEs had begun buying risky loans in 1993 to meet the “affordable housing” requirements established under congressional direction by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).

Most of the damage was done from 2005 through 2007, when Fannie and Freddie were binging on risky mortgages. Back then, Mr. Frank was the bartender, denying that there was any cause for concern, and claiming that he wanted to “roll the dice” on subsidized housing support.

Roll the dice he did, and the Republicans were not able to stop him,

There is more to this ugly situation. New research by Edward Pinto, a former chief credit officer for Fannie Mae and a housing expert, has found that from the time Fannie and Freddie began buying risky loans as early as 1993, they routinely misrepresented the mortgages they were acquiring, reporting them as prime when they had characteristics that made them clearly subprime or Alt-A.

An Alt-A mortgage is one in which the quality of the mortgage or the underwriting was deficient; it might lack adequate documentation, have a low or no down payment, or in some other way be more likely than a prime mortgage to default. Fannie and Freddie were also reporting these mortgages as prime, according to Mr. Pinto.

It gets worse. Go read the rest of the article.

Tags: , , , , , ,

2 Responses to “Fannie, Freddie, and Barnie”

  1. Tweets that mention Fausta’s Blog » Blog Archive » Fannie, Freddie, and Barnie -- Says:

    […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Fausta and Fausta, Fausta. Fausta said: Fannie, Freddie, and Barnie: The Price for Fannie and Freddie Keeps Going Up Barney Frank’s decision to ‘roll t… […]

  2. Nolanimrod Says:

    Ah, la Mysterieuse. You’re up and about.

    Barney Frank. How many times, do you wonder, has Barney’s name figured in his pre-boudoir patter.

    I saw the videos. People sitting in the congressional hot seat and being shouted at (and saved from being drenched in spit only by their distance form the speaker) as Barney Frank railed at them about their evil designs to prevent people from HAVING AFFORDABLE HOUSING.

    He’s still at it. Now he wants to ruin the last federal housing agency: FHA.

    Is it because he’s from Massachusetts? Is it because he’s homosexual? Is it because ACORN has one of his relatives in a cave in Idaho? What? Why does he want to ruin the U.S. financially?